Microsoft SharePoint Vulnerability: Not Just a Lesson in On-Prem Software

The recent disclosure of active attacks targeting internet-exposed, on-premise Microsoft SharePoint software isn’t just another zero-day headline;  it’s a stark example of how the gap between vulnerability disclosure and remediation continues to tip the odds in favor of attackers. Microsoft’s warning was blunt:

“If you have SharePoint on-prem exposed to the internet, you should assume that you have been compromised at this point. Patching alone is insufficient to fully evict the threat.” — Matt Sikorski, Microsoft Threat Intelligence (CRN)

That statement captures the heart of the issue: even after patching, the compromise may already be entrenched. A software update doesn’t reveal what attackers accessed or whether they’re still inside.  

This breach also highlights a growing inflection point in cybersecurity strategy. SaaS is no longer just a business enabler; it’s increasingly seen as a path to faster, vendor-managed patching and risk reduction. Many teams are rethinking their reliance on internally hosted systems as they recognize that cloud-based SaaS solutions can offload some of the heavy operational burden of vulnerability management. But as this breach illustrates, the decision isn’t simple. Handing over control to SaaS vendors may accelerate patch timelines, yet it also introduces new layers of third-party risk and visibility gaps. On the other hand, keeping systems on-prem demands that already overstretched teams respond to every zero-day and patch cycle in real time, often without the resources to do so effectively. It’s a tradeoff between control and agility, and the right answer may depend less on technology and more on trust, capability, and organizational risk appetite. However, the bottom line is that security is no longer just about where your software runs. It’s about whether you can see what happens after an attacker gets in.

The Patch Delay is the Real Risk

By the time Microsoft released emergency patches for SharePoint 2019 and Subscription Edition, attackers had already compromised systems, stolen credentials, and embedded persistent access points. SharePoint 2016 remains unpatched. Even systems that have been patched do not guarantee safety because the real vulnerability isn’t about the software; it’s about timing.

The delay isn’t the result of negligence; it’s inherent to the on-premises structure. Enterprises must navigate change control procedures, validation cycles, business risk assessments, and compliance rules. They cannot deploy emergency updates as quickly as cloud services. Even when teams act swiftly, there's usually a delay long enough for attackers to infiltrate, steal what they need, and stay hidden long after the patch. This fragility isn’t exclusive to on-premise software; it’s just more visible.

Zero Day Today – Credential Theft Forever

Once attackers gain access to your machine keys, they don’t need to maintain remote code execution. In the SharePoint incident, they exploited the vulnerability to steal authentication data, establish long-lasting access points, and operate from within the environment, legitimately authenticated and invisibly persistent.

This method—initial access via exploit, persistence via credentials—isn't new. But it’s becoming the dominant playbook. And it applies far beyond SharePoint:

• A compromised SaaS admin account can be used to authorize malicious OAuth integrations.

• A stolen service account can slowly exfiltrate sensitive data at a rate imperceptible to most traditional protections.  

• An attacker with a valid token can operate indefinitely under the radar; they don’t need stealth, they have legitimacy.

Once an identity is compromised, it doesn’t matter how quickly the original vulnerability is patched. You’re already defending against unknown adversaries that you have no visibility into, and your defense ends where the attacker begins.

The Attack Coming from Inside the House

What happens when an attacker is already on the inside? Most defenses focus on pre-login gates: MFA, conditional access, and device posture. But these defenses assume the attacker is still on the outside looking in.  

Security teams need to see beyond the login. Not just whether someone authenticated successfully, but also what they did after. Did they:

• Access and sell your customer data?

• Steal privileged information for their own enrichment?

• Inject themselves in sensitive integrations or APIs?

These signals often go unnoticed by traditional tools. They require session awareness, behavioral analysis, and contextual detection—capabilities traditional tools rarely provide. That’s where modern Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) 2.0 comes into play. ITDR 2.0 focuses not just on authentication logs but also on behavioral deviations across cloud services. As identity threats become more sophisticated, visibility must evolve, too.

Takeaways from the Microsoft SharePoint Vulnerability

The attacker behavior revealed in this breach—stealing credentials and moving laterally with elevated trust—mirrors what we see in SaaS environments every day. SaaS also presents its own unique challenges: federated identities, third-party OAuth apps, browser session tokens, and decentralized access sprawl. Once compromised, those identities often don’t trigger alerts through traditional log or SIEM-based tools.

The SharePoint vulnerability illustrates a bigger truth:

• Patching is necessary but doesn’t ensure remediation.

• Imposters are real. Credential validity doesn’t equal safety.

• Post-auth risks are pervasive. From on-prem to SaaS platforms, once the keys to the kingdom are handed over, risk skyrockets.

Whether the access point is an outdated server or a sanctioned SaaS platform, the method is the same: get credentials, act like a user, and blend in. If you look like you belong, modern systems will likely treat you that way. Detection strategies must evolve accordingly.

Conclusion

Microsoft’s warning didn’t sugarcoat the risk, and neither should we. Overstretched teams must confront the full threat lifecycle: zero-days that enable pre-patch exploitation, the critical window between patch release and deployment, and the lingering dangers of post-patch persistent access.

The Microsoft SharePoint vulnerability isn’t just a cautionary tale about the risks of on-prem software; it’s a call to action for identity-first detection. No matter where your systems live, assuming that strong access controls alone equate to security is a dangerous bet.

Preventing tomorrow’s full-scale breaches demands today’s proactive defenses. That’s why forward-leaning security teams are turning to post-login behavioral visibility, not as an add-on, but as a core strategy to detect threats before they escalate into headlines.

‍